Pravin Patole (Transplant Year: 2021)
Treatment : Liver Transplant
Saket Khadakkar (Transplant Year: 2021)
Treatment : Liver Transplant
Pravin Patole (Transplant Year: 2021)
Treatment : Liver Transplant
Saket Khadakkar (Transplant Year: 2021)
Treatment : Liver Transplant
Pravin Patole (Transplant Year: 2021)
Treatment : Liver Transplant
Saket Khadakkar (Transplant Year: 2021)
Treatment : Liver Transplant
Error: Contact form not found.
Recently there has been a stir after claims that certain commercially sold eggs contained residues of banned chemicals potentially linked to cancer. This sparked panic among many “egg-eaters” — but before jumping to conclusions, it’s important to separate two very different issues:
Food contamination (e.g. antibiotic or chemical residues that may increase cancer risk).
Inherent properties of eggs (cholesterol, proteins, fats) and whether these make eggs themselves carcinogenic when consumed normally.
As was pointed out in the controversy, the worry was about contaminated eggs from a specific supplier — not eggs in general.
So, the core question remains: Do eggs themselves — when clean, properly produced — increase cancer risk?
A recent “scoping review” surveying many studies concluded that evidence for a causal link between egg consumption and cancer is weak and inconsistent.
However, these studies suffer from important limitations: reliance on self-reported diet, confounding factors (other dietary habits, overall lifestyle), and in many cases small effect sizes or inconsistent findings.
Given the mixed and inconclusive data — and the weakness of many positive associations — most nutrition and cancer-research experts conclude that eggs themselves are not strongly carcinogenic.
In other words: the claim “eggs cause cancer” is not supported by reliable, consistent scientific evidence.
That said — and importantly — the dose matters. Very high consumption (many eggs per week) may carry some increased risk, much like many other animal-derived foods when overused.
The recent uproar around eggs and cancer risk was sparked not because of eggs per se — but because of alleged chemical residue in eggs from certain suppliers.
Substances such as certain antibiotics (for instance, banned nitrofurans/nitroimidazoles) may be genotoxic — that is, they can damage DNA and potentially promote cancer.
The Times of India
Thus, if eggs are contaminated — that is a food-safety issue, not a nutritional “eggs are cancerous” issue.
This distinction is crucial. Clean, well-regulated eggs differ dramatically from eggs contaminated with harmful substances.
Eggs are not just about proteins — they have nutrients that specifically support the liver. Here’s how eggs and liver health link together:
Thus, for healthy individuals with balanced diet — eggs may support liver health. But in cases of existing liver disease, metabolic syndrome, or excessive consumption — caution may be warranted.
Based on the evidence as it stands:
Eggs remain one of the most accessible, nutrient-rich non-vegetarian protein sources worldwide. While some studies suggest a possible modest increase in cancer risk with very high egg consumption, the bulk of scientific opinion finds no convincing evidence that eggs — when eaten moderately — cause cancer. On the contrary, eggs can offer valuable support for liver health, muscle maintenance, and metabolic functions, particularly via high-quality protein and nutrients like choline.
As with most foods, the key is balance, moderation, and sourcing. Clean eggs, eaten as part of a varied diet — not overconsumed — are more ally than enemy.
Recent Comments